Photo by amine photographe on PexelsFrench rarely says "it was done" the way English does. Here's how the passive voice actually works, when native speakers avoid it, and how on replaces it in speech.
You want to tell a French friend My phone was stolen at the market, and your brain reaches for a word-for-word version of "was stolen" -- except what comes out sounds like a police report, not a sentence anyone actually says out loud. That's your first clue that French treats the passive voice very differently from English, and once you see why, you'll stop overusing a construction native speakers barely reach for in casual conversation.
The passive voice is the one where the subject receives the action instead of doing it -- The window was broken, not I broke the window. English leans on it constantly, in headlines, in polite deflection, in sentences where nobody wants to name who did something. French has the exact same structure available, but reaches for it far less often in speech, which means two things: you do need to recognize it, because it shows up everywhere in news articles, official documents, and formal writing, but you shouldn't lean on it as your default the way you might in English, because a French speaker retelling the same story out loud would usually reach for a different tool entirely.
Start with how the true passive is actually built. French uses être, conjugated in whatever tense the sentence needs, plus the past participle of the main verb, plus par (by) to introduce who did the action, if you're naming them at all. Le chef prépare le repas (the chef prepares the meal) is active -- le chef is doing the preparing. Flip it around and you get Le repas est préparé par le chef (the meal is prepared by the chef) -- le repas, the thing being acted on, becomes the subject, and the doer moves after par, or drops out completely if it doesn't matter who did it.
Because être is doing the conjugating, the sentence shifts tense exactly the way être normally would. Present: la lettre est écrite (the letter is written). Passé composé: la lettre a été écrite (the letter was written) -- notice été, the past participle of être itself, sitting in front of the main verb's own past participle. Futur: la lettre sera écrite (the letter will be written). Imparfait: la lettre était écrite (the letter used to be written). In every case it's the same skeleton -- a form of être, then the past participle of the real verb -- just with être conjugated into whichever tense the sentence calls for.
Because the past participle is attached to être rather than avoir, it always agrees in gender and number with the subject, the same way it does in any être-based passé composé. Le repas est préparé (masculine singular) becomes la lettre est écrite (feminine singular) or les lettres sont écrites (feminine plural) -- the ending shifts to match whatever's actually receiving the action. Skipping that agreement is the single most common mistake with the French passive: writing la lettre est écrit, with no feminine -e, is the kind of slip a native speaker reads as a typo rather than a real grammar error, but it's worth training out early.
Here's the part most textbooks underplay: spoken French reaches for the passive far less than English does, because it has two more natural alternatives close at hand. The most common is on, a subject pronoun that roughly means one, they, or people in general, and doubles as an all-purpose way to describe something happening without naming who did it. On a volé mon vélo literally means someone stole my bike, but it does the exact same job as the English passive my bike was stolen -- and it's what a French speaker would actually say to a friend, not Mon vélo a été volé, which is grammatically correct but sounds closer to a police report than a conversation.
The second alternative is the reflexive se, used for general truths, habits, or things that simply happen a certain way, with no specific actor in mind at all: Le vin se boit frais (wine is drunk chilled), Ça ne se dit pas (that isn't said, people don't say that), Cette expression s'utilise beaucoup (that expression gets used a lot). None of these have an obvious agent -- nobody in particular is being credited with drinking wine chilled -- which is exactly the kind of sentence where French defaults to se instead of the heavier être-plus-par construction.
A short list worth having ready: la voix passive (lah vwah pah-seev) -- the passive voice. être (eh-truh) -- to be, the auxiliary that carries the passive. le participe passé (luh par-tee-seep pah-say) -- the past participle. par (par) -- by, introducing the agent. on (ohn) -- one, they, people, the everyday substitute for a passive sentence. se (suh) -- the reflexive marker used for general, agent-less statements. l'agent (lah-zhahn) -- the agent, the doer of the action, when one is actually named.
You'll see the true être-plus-par passive constantly in written French -- newspaper headlines lean on it heavily for a neutral, formal tone: Le président a été élu hier (the president was elected yesterday), Deux suspects ont été arrêtés (two suspects were arrested). That formality is exactly why it sounds stiff in casual speech. Reading headlines from Le Monde or France 24 is a genuinely good way to see the passive used the way native speakers actually use it, in writing, while noticing how rarely the same structure comes up when those same speakers are just chatting with each other.
Picture reading a French news headline with a friend and then retelling it out loud. The headline reads Un nouveau pont a été construit dans la ville (a new bridge was built in the city). Retelling it to a friend, you'd more naturally say On a construit un nouveau pont dans la ville -- same information, but the version a French speaker would actually reach for across a table, not the one they'd read off a page.
Try it yourself. Turn this active sentence into the passive: Le professeur corrige les copies. Fill in the blank with the correctly agreed past participle: La maison a été (construire) en 1900. Rewrite this passive sentence more naturally using on: Le gâteau a été mangé par les enfants. Fill in the blank with se or on: Cette chanson ___ écoute partout en été (this song gets listened to everywhere in summer). Translate to French using the true passive: The email was sent this morning. Multiple choice: which auxiliary does the French passive always use -- avoir, être, or aller?
Answer key: Les copies sont corrigées par le professeur -- copies is the thing receiving the action, so it becomes the subject. La maison a été construite en 1900 -- construite needs the extra -e to agree with the feminine maison. On a mangé le gâteau -- swapping in on drops the passive construction entirely for the version a French speaker would actually say. Cette chanson s'écoute partout en été takes se, since there's no specific agent, just a general truth about the song. L'e-mail a été envoyé ce matin uses the true passive correctly, with été carrying the tense and envoyé agreeing with the masculine e-mail. Être is the only auxiliary the French passive ever uses.
Three things to carry forward: the French passive is built from être, conjugated into whatever tense you need, plus the main verb's past participle, which always agrees with the subject in gender and number. Native speakers reach for it constantly in writing -- especially the news -- but lean on on or a reflexive se instead when they're actually talking, so recognizing both alternatives matters as much as building the passive itself. And when in doubt in conversation, on is almost always the more natural choice over a full être-plus-par sentence. Ready to make all three feel automatic? Head over to Grammar for more on être and past participle agreement, or try a round of Exercises to drill the passive voice until spotting on ahead of a hidden passive stops taking a second thought.